Nov
17
2009
Uncategorized By Paralegal | 8 comments

UPDATE ON ATTORNEY PHILIP J. BERG’S ACTIVE CASES AS OF NOVEMBER. 17, 2009

Below is an update on Philip J. Berg’s Active Cases:

Berg v. Obama, et al

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Case No. 08-cv-04083

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Case No. 08-4340

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals just affirmed the lower Court.  What this means is that the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld Judge Surrick’s ruling.  We are appealing to the U.S.  Supreme Court.

Berg as Relator v. Obama

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Ca No. 08-cv-1933

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, Case No. 09-5362

This case is currently before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.  We are in the process of filing our initial Appellant documents.

Hollister v. Soetoro, et al

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia,  Case No. 08-cv-02254

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, Case No. 09-5080 consolidated with 09-5161

This Case is currently in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.  Appellant’s Opening brief is due November 20, 2009.

Nov
16
2009
Media By admin | 3 comments

PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE ON THE ROTH SHOW

Philip J. Berg, Esquire is on the Roth Show with Dr. Laurie Roth every Monday at 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time. You can listen live to the show by going to http://therothshow.com.

Join Phil as he discusses the issues surrounding the Soetoro/Obama Hoax and obtain updates on his pending cases.

Nov
16
2009
Cases By admin | 6 comments

Berg as Relator v. Obama (Sealed Case)

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Case No. 08-cv-1933

1.   Berg as Relator Qui Tam Complaint;
2.   Exhibit A to Berg as Relator Qui Tam Complaint;
3.   Exhibits B-D to Berg as Relator Qui Tam Complaint;
4.   Government Motion to Dismiss;
5.   Berg as Relator’s Motion to Unseal the Case;
6.   Government’s Opposition to Unsealing the Case;
7.   Berg as Relator Opposition to the Government’s Motion to Dismiss;
8.   Berg as Relator Brief in Support of his Opposition to the Government’s Motion to Dismiss;
9.   The Government’s Reply to Berg as Relator’s Opposition to Gov’t Motion to Dismiss;
10.  Berg as Relator’s Reply to Gov’t Response to Berg’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss;
11.  Judge Roberts Order Dismissing the Qui Tam Action;
12.  Berg as Relator’s Motion for Reconsideration;
13.  Berg’s Motion Requesting a Hearing;
14.  Government’s Opposition to Berg as Relator’s Motion for Reconsideration;

15. Berg as Relator’s Reply to the Govt’s Opposition to Berg’s Motion for Reconsideration

Nov
16
2009
Cases By admin | 4 comments

Hollister v. Soetoro, et al

United States District Court for the District of Columbia – Case No. 08-cv-02254 JR

1.   Hollister Motion to file an Interpleader Action;
2.   Hollister Interpleader Action;
3.   Hollister, Defendants Motion to Dismiss;
4.   The Court’s 2/4/09 Order re:  Pro Hac Vice for Berg and Joyce;
5.   Hollister’s Motion to vacate the Court’s Order of 2/4/09;
6.   Court’s Order of 2/11/09;
7.   Court’s Order to Show Cause 2/25/09;
8.   Hollister’s Response to the Court’s Order to Show Cause 2/26/09;
9.   Hollister First Amended Complaint;
10.  Hollister Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss;
11.  Hollister, Defendants Reply to Hollister’s Opposition to their Motion to Dismiss;
12.  Hollister’s Motion to file a Surreply;
13.  Hollister’s Surreply;
14.  Judge Robertson Ruling dismissing case;
15.  Hollister, Response to Order to Show Cause re Sanctions;
16.  Hollister’s Supplemental to Response to the Court’s Order to Show Cause re Sanctions; and
17.  Judge Robertson Ruling on the Sanction issues;

Nov
13
2009
Cases By admin | 6 comments

Berg v. Obama, et al U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Case No. 08-4340
Lower Court:  U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of PA, Case No. 08-cv-04083

1.  Berg’s Notice of Appeal (above file – Berg v. Obama, Notice of Appeal from Pacer)
2.  Berg’s Concise Statement of the Case (above file – Obama pacer filed concise statement of case 3rd circuit)
3.  Berg’s Emergency Motion for a Temp. Injunction staying the Presidential Election
4.  FEC’s Opposition to Berg’s Emergency Motion for an Injunction (above file – Berg v[1] Obama — FEC’s Opp to Berg Inj 3d Cir 10-31-08)
5.  Obama and DNC’s Opposition to Berg’s Emergency Injunction 10/31/08
6.  Court’s Denial of Berg’s Emergency Motion for a Temp. Injunction staying the Election 10/31/08
7.  FEC Motion asking for 3rd Circuit to Affirm Lower Court (above file – 3rd Circuit FEC asking for 3rd circuit to affirm lower court)
8.  FEC’s Exhibits in support of their Motion asking for Affirmance (above file – 3rd circuit, FEC exhibits to their motion for…)
9.  Berg’s Response in Opposition to the FEC’s Motion requesting the affirmance of the lower Court’s Ruling (above file – 3rd circuit…)
10.  Berg’s Motion for an Injunction prohibiting the certification of the electors 12/04/08 (above file – MotionThirdCircuitInjunction 12 04 08)
11.  FEC’s Opposition to Berg’s Emergency Injunction 12/08/08
12.  Court’s Denial of Berg’s Emergency Injunction 12/09/08
13.  Berg’s Opening Brief (above file – Berg Brief 3rd Circuit 01 20 09)
14.  Berg’s Appendix Volume II (above file – Berg 3rd Circuit Appendix Vol II to go with Brief)
15.  Obama and the DNC’s Opening Brief (above file – 3rd Circuit DNC and Obama Brief)
16.  FEC’s Opening Brief (above file – 3rd Circuit Brief of FEC 02 17 09)

17.  Berg 3rd Circuit Request for Judicial Notice of the October 5, 2009 Transcript in Keyes, et al v. Obama, et al before Judge Carter in California (above file – ZBerg3rdCirReqforJudicialNotice102509[1]);
18.  Berg 3rd Circuit Request for Judicial Notice of Judge Carter’s October 29, 2009 Ruling in the California case Keyes, et al v. Obama, et al  (above file – ZBerg3rdCirReqJudicialNotice111009);
19.  Court’s Ruling of Nov. 02, 2009 denying Berg’s Request for Judicial Notice; and
20.  Court’s Ruling of Nov. 13, 2009 Denying Appeal and Affirming the lower Court

Nov
12
2009
Cases By admin | 54 comments

Berg v. Obama, et al

U.S.  District Court, Eastern District of PA – Case No. 08-cv-04083-RBS

1.  Berg’s Complaint
2.  Berg’s Motion for an Injunction stopping the DNC from nominating Obama as the Democratic Candidate;
3.  Berg’s Memorandum of Law in support of his Motion for an Injunction;
4.  Obama and the DNC’s Opposition to Berg’s Injunction
5.  Obama, FEC and the DNC’s Motion to Dismiss Berg’s Complaint;
6.  Berg’s Motion to File a First Amended Complaint;
7.  Berg’s First Amended Complaint;
8.  Obama and DNC Motion to Dismiss Berg’s First Amended Complaint;
9.  Berg’s Opposition to Obama and the DNC’s Motion to Dismiss;
10.  Obama and the DNC’s Motion for a Protective Order;
11.  Berg’s Opposition to Obama and the DNC’s Motion for a Protective Order;
12.  Obama’s Request for Admissions deemed Admitted;
13.  Berg’s Motion requesting a Court Order deeming the Request for Admissions served upon Obama deemed admitted;
14.  Berg’s Motion for an Expedited Ruling on Berg’s Motion deeming the Admissions served upon Obama admitted; and
15.  Judge Surrick Ruling.

Latest

Archives