<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama is NOT using a Stolen or Fraudulent Social Security Number.  “xxx-xx-4425” is Obama’s Legal Social Security Number.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://obamacrimes.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://obamacrimes.com/?p=1610</link>
	<description>by the Law Offices of Philip J. Berg &#124; http://philjberg.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 20:50:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://obamacrimes.com/?p=1610&#038;cpage=1#comment-90128</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obamacrimes.com/?p=1610#comment-90128</guid>
		<description>I was born of a US mother and a Canadian father in Canada. I held dual citizenship until joining the US Military at age 19. My Us citizenship derived as follows this quote from the Nationality Act of 1940: Section 201 g. 

&quot;A person born outside the United States and it&#039;s outlying possessions of parents, one of whom is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, has had ten years&#039; residence in the United States or outlying possessions, at least five of which were after obtaining the age of sixteen years, the other being an alien.&quot;

In support of what &#039;cherrie&#039; says above concerning her father, there are also misspellings of my birth name in the military and subsequently on my SSN. Reason? During induction processing they did not transcribe the info from your actual certificate (not in my possession at the time) but rather from verbal discussion while shuttling through a line issuing uniforms. So whatever the clerk thought was the proper spelling became your ID and all subsequent papers, right or wrong. As it was only my middle name I paid no attention to it back in the 60&#039;s as I never used it, only the initial.

What I would like to know; what of the Arpaio investigation claiming fraudulent birth certificate and SS card as the documents had layers when viewed by computer graphics, something that is not possible from a printed document?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was born of a US mother and a Canadian father in Canada. I held dual citizenship until joining the US Military at age 19. My Us citizenship derived as follows this quote from the Nationality Act of 1940: Section 201 g. </p>
<p>&#8220;A person born outside the United States and it&#8217;s outlying possessions of parents, one of whom is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, has had ten years&#8217; residence in the United States or outlying possessions, at least five of which were after obtaining the age of sixteen years, the other being an alien.&#8221;</p>
<p>In support of what &#8216;cherrie&#8217; says above concerning her father, there are also misspellings of my birth name in the military and subsequently on my SSN. Reason? During induction processing they did not transcribe the info from your actual certificate (not in my possession at the time) but rather from verbal discussion while shuttling through a line issuing uniforms. So whatever the clerk thought was the proper spelling became your ID and all subsequent papers, right or wrong. As it was only my middle name I paid no attention to it back in the 60&#8242;s as I never used it, only the initial.</p>
<p>What I would like to know; what of the Arpaio investigation claiming fraudulent birth certificate and SS card as the documents had layers when viewed by computer graphics, something that is not possible from a printed document?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YJ Draiman</title>
		<link>http://obamacrimes.com/?p=1610&#038;cpage=1#comment-85999</link>
		<dc:creator>YJ Draiman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obamacrimes.com/?p=1610#comment-85999</guid>
		<description>There is a rule of law in this country and that rule of law must be enforced, without discrimination whatsoever, no matter what the law.

Obama must abide by the laws of the United States of America

There rule of law also states that English is the official language of The United States of America and as people living in this country you must understand, speak &amp; write English.

My parents went to night school to learn English.

If you care enough to live in this country and enjoy the benefits of this country, it is you obligation to speak the language of this country &quot;English&quot; and abide by the laws which are written in English.

Do you know any other country in the world that provides the kind of assistance in language barrier as the United States, I do not think so.

I was very disappointed today, when I went shopping for some vegetables here in Los Angeles, the clerk called the numbers in Spanish and I missed my turn.

There is nothing wrong with speaking multiple languages; I would say it is a great advantage. You must remember the official language of this country is English, all highway signs are in English, etc., therefore, make it you business to speak it.

Thank you

YJ Draiman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a rule of law in this country and that rule of law must be enforced, without discrimination whatsoever, no matter what the law.</p>
<p>Obama must abide by the laws of the United States of America</p>
<p>There rule of law also states that English is the official language of The United States of America and as people living in this country you must understand, speak &amp; write English.</p>
<p>My parents went to night school to learn English.</p>
<p>If you care enough to live in this country and enjoy the benefits of this country, it is you obligation to speak the language of this country &#8220;English&#8221; and abide by the laws which are written in English.</p>
<p>Do you know any other country in the world that provides the kind of assistance in language barrier as the United States, I do not think so.</p>
<p>I was very disappointed today, when I went shopping for some vegetables here in Los Angeles, the clerk called the numbers in Spanish and I missed my turn.</p>
<p>There is nothing wrong with speaking multiple languages; I would say it is a great advantage. You must remember the official language of this country is English, all highway signs are in English, etc., therefore, make it you business to speak it.</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
<p>YJ Draiman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandi</title>
		<link>http://obamacrimes.com/?p=1610&#038;cpage=1#comment-85955</link>
		<dc:creator>sandi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obamacrimes.com/?p=1610#comment-85955</guid>
		<description>Colleges didn&#039;t need a SS#  before attending (Before 1986).  SS# weren&#039;t needed other than if you applied for work . It was 1969 before SS# were issued at birth, and not when you were old enough to work, and that was for parents to claim you as a dependent on income tax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colleges didn&#8217;t need a SS#  before attending (Before 1986).  SS# weren&#8217;t needed other than if you applied for work . It was 1969 before SS# were issued at birth, and not when you were old enough to work, and that was for parents to claim you as a dependent on income tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://obamacrimes.com/?p=1610&#038;cpage=1#comment-85727</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 07:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obamacrimes.com/?p=1610#comment-85727</guid>
		<description>Legal, that is, if you&#039;re a citizen.  If you&#039;re not a citizen, then a SS # in your name isn&#039;t legal, no matter the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legal, that is, if you&#8217;re a citizen.  If you&#8217;re not a citizen, then a SS # in your name isn&#8217;t legal, no matter the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold Pack</title>
		<link>http://obamacrimes.com/?p=1610&#038;cpage=1#comment-85326</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold Pack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obamacrimes.com/?p=1610#comment-85326</guid>
		<description>This link is to positive proof that Obama is not eligible. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
 
 
 
I am sending this link as I beleive the information it contains is valid, however, I am confident that you have the ability as well as the staff to verify the information on the site. Trust but verify is the rule. Notice that in order to be a Natural born citizen as per the 14nth amendment the requirement is to be the offspring of citizen parents (plural not singular) both parents must be US citizens. These statements by the people who authored and pased the 14nth amendment at the time it was passed are clarification of the original intent of the amendment. 
Original intent: The theory of interpretation by which judges attempt to ascertain the meaning of a particular provision of a state or federal constitution by determining how the provision was understood at the time it was drafted and ratified.
. http://www.14thamendment.us/articles/anchor_babies_unconstitutionality.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This link is to positive proof that Obama is not eligible. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</p>
<p>I am sending this link as I beleive the information it contains is valid, however, I am confident that you have the ability as well as the staff to verify the information on the site. Trust but verify is the rule. Notice that in order to be a Natural born citizen as per the 14nth amendment the requirement is to be the offspring of citizen parents (plural not singular) both parents must be US citizens. These statements by the people who authored and pased the 14nth amendment at the time it was passed are clarification of the original intent of the amendment.<br />
Original intent: The theory of interpretation by which judges attempt to ascertain the meaning of a particular provision of a state or federal constitution by determining how the provision was understood at the time it was drafted and ratified.<br />
. <a href="http://www.14thamendment.us/articles/anchor_babies_unconstitutionality.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.14thamendment.us/articles/anchor_babies_unconstitutionality.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://obamacrimes.com/?p=1610&#038;cpage=1#comment-85168</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 03:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obamacrimes.com/?p=1610#comment-85168</guid>
		<description>It is explained in the Press Release on the front page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is explained in the Press Release on the front page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johninlongmont</title>
		<link>http://obamacrimes.com/?p=1610&#038;cpage=1#comment-84972</link>
		<dc:creator>johninlongmont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obamacrimes.com/?p=1610#comment-84972</guid>
		<description>Berg still never explains how obama got the CT SSN...sure he &quot;COULD HAVE&quot; requested it from a CT office, BUT COME ON!!!...and that list of HI residents with CT SSNs that he says were issued the same time as obama&#039;s? -- there is no &quot;issue date&quot; in the data he shows...why does Berg insist on discrediting any birther arguments except his?...makes me suspicious</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Berg still never explains how obama got the CT SSN&#8230;sure he &#8220;COULD HAVE&#8221; requested it from a CT office, BUT COME ON!!!&#8230;and that list of HI residents with CT SSNs that he says were issued the same time as obama&#8217;s? &#8212; there is no &#8220;issue date&#8221; in the data he shows&#8230;why does Berg insist on discrediting any birther arguments except his?&#8230;makes me suspicious</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Thompson</title>
		<link>http://obamacrimes.com/?p=1610&#038;cpage=1#comment-84772</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 05:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obamacrimes.com/?p=1610#comment-84772</guid>
		<description>Tom,while the Supreme court did declare that a &quot;natural born citizen&quot; is a child born on US soil to American citizen parents (plural) in Happersett v minor it has NEVER EVER referred to a &quot;dual citizen at birth&quot; as a natural born citizen. Citizen yes but NOT natural born. I think this will become increasingly important in the upcoming challenges at each state ballot. If I&#039;m think correctly, the burden will be upon Obama to prove he is a natural born citizen and nowhere in the Constitution or any Supreme Court ruling does it say a dual citizen at birth is a natural born citizen....checkmate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,while the Supreme court did declare that a &#8220;natural born citizen&#8221; is a child born on US soil to American citizen parents (plural) in Happersett v minor it has NEVER EVER referred to a &#8220;dual citizen at birth&#8221; as a natural born citizen. Citizen yes but NOT natural born. I think this will become increasingly important in the upcoming challenges at each state ballot. If I&#8217;m think correctly, the burden will be upon Obama to prove he is a natural born citizen and nowhere in the Constitution or any Supreme Court ruling does it say a dual citizen at birth is a natural born citizen&#8230;.checkmate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Thompson</title>
		<link>http://obamacrimes.com/?p=1610&#038;cpage=1#comment-84736</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 06:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obamacrimes.com/?p=1610#comment-84736</guid>
		<description>Phil, I started with you in the original obamacrimes discussion group. A lot of us are still together at a hidden site that I administer. We&#039;ve done a lot of research on this SS# issue and frankly those who&#039;ve been told of your assertion that Obama&#039;s SS# is not illegal are somewhat dumbfounded. I&#039;m sure you are aware that Obama&#039;s grandmother worked with SS# records in Hawaii. Of course you most likely won&#039;t find a death related to Obama&#039;s SS#. The Hawaiian record keeping system has been a mess. You may want to check out butterdezillion...she has done more research than anybody I know. butterdezillion.com. 
  I&#039;m glad to see that you will be trying the approach I suggested three years ago...challenge Obama at the ballot boxes. The SOSs lied to us in 2008 when they said the national DNC certified Obama&#039;s eligibility. Challenging his placement on the ballot shouldn&#039;t require &quot;standing&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, I started with you in the original obamacrimes discussion group. A lot of us are still together at a hidden site that I administer. We&#8217;ve done a lot of research on this SS# issue and frankly those who&#8217;ve been told of your assertion that Obama&#8217;s SS# is not illegal are somewhat dumbfounded. I&#8217;m sure you are aware that Obama&#8217;s grandmother worked with SS# records in Hawaii. Of course you most likely won&#8217;t find a death related to Obama&#8217;s SS#. The Hawaiian record keeping system has been a mess. You may want to check out butterdezillion&#8230;she has done more research than anybody I know. butterdezillion.com.<br />
  I&#8217;m glad to see that you will be trying the approach I suggested three years ago&#8230;challenge Obama at the ballot boxes. The SOSs lied to us in 2008 when they said the national DNC certified Obama&#8217;s eligibility. Challenging his placement on the ballot shouldn&#8217;t require &#8220;standing&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://obamacrimes.com/?p=1610&#038;cpage=1#comment-84709</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 04:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obamacrimes.com/?p=1610#comment-84709</guid>
		<description>Phil when do you plan to retract your statement &quot;Obama is NOT using a stolen Social Security number&quot;? Your sole evidence was that several people who lived in Hawaii had Connecticutt SS#. Problem you have is you got the info from the only place you could access from the Social Security Administration - The death list. If you had checked the people on this list you would have found that they all were either born in Connecticutt or lived there when they applied and received their Social Security numbers. Obama was not born in Connecticutt nor ever lived there.
The people on your list did move to Hawaii and eventually died there. Thus they had Connecticutt Social Security numbers. I&#039;ll look for your retraction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil when do you plan to retract your statement &#8220;Obama is NOT using a stolen Social Security number&#8221;? Your sole evidence was that several people who lived in Hawaii had Connecticutt SS#. Problem you have is you got the info from the only place you could access from the Social Security Administration &#8211; The death list. If you had checked the people on this list you would have found that they all were either born in Connecticutt or lived there when they applied and received their Social Security numbers. Obama was not born in Connecticutt nor ever lived there.<br />
The people on your list did move to Hawaii and eventually died there. Thus they had Connecticutt Social Security numbers. I&#8217;ll look for your retraction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
