Hollister v. Soetoro, et al

United States District Court for the District of Columbia – Case No. 08-cv-02254 JR

1.   Hollister Motion to file an Interpleader Action;
2.   Hollister Interpleader Action;
3.   Hollister, Defendants Motion to Dismiss;
4.   The Court’s 2/4/09 Order re:  Pro Hac Vice for Berg and Joyce;
5.   Hollister’s Motion to vacate the Court’s Order of 2/4/09;
6.   Court’s Order of 2/11/09;
7.   Court’s Order to Show Cause 2/25/09;
8.   Hollister’s Response to the Court’s Order to Show Cause 2/26/09;
9.   Hollister First Amended Complaint;
10.  Hollister Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss;
11.  Hollister, Defendants Reply to Hollister’s Opposition to their Motion to Dismiss;
12.  Hollister’s Motion to file a Surreply;
13.  Hollister’s Surreply;
14.  Judge Robertson Ruling dismissing case;
15.  Hollister, Response to Order to Show Cause re Sanctions;
16.  Hollister’s Supplemental to Response to the Court’s Order to Show Cause re Sanctions; and
17.  Judge Robertson Ruling on the Sanction issues;

18.  Hollister, Appellant’s Motion to file his Reply Brief Nunc Pro Tunc or in the alternative an Extension of Time;

19.  Hollister, Appellant’s Reply Brief;

20.  Hollister, Appellant’s Emergency Motion to Withdraw materials filed by Attorney, John D. Hemenway;

21.   Hollister, Motion of Lawrence J. Joyce as in Pro Se Amicus for himself and as Counsel for Amicus, Philip J. Berg for Leave of Court for to file a Brief Amicus Curiae;

22.  Hollister, Brief Amicus Curiae of Lawrence J. Joyce as in Pro Se Amicus for himself and as Counsel for Amicus, Philip J. Berg

23.  Reply of Amici Lawrence J. Joyce, Esq. and Philip J. Berg, Esq. to Appellants Opposition to Joyce and Berg’s Motion for Leave to file a Brief Amicus Curiae

24.  Declaration of Lawrence J. Joyce, Esq. in support of his and Mr. Berg’s Reply

25.  Declaration of Philip J. Berg, Esq. in support of his and Mr. Joyce’s Reply

26.  Declaration of Lisa Liberi in support of Mr. Joyce and Mr. Berg’s Reply

Posted November 16, 2009 by admin. Comments and trackbacks are open. Follow the comments feed.
Filed under:
Tagged with: .

2 Responses to “Hollister v. Soetoro, et al”

  1. admin says:
    April 30, 2010 at 9:10 PM

    Hollister v Soetoro has been dismissed in the DC Circuit court of Appeals.

    This case by choice of Hollister is now under the direction of John Heminway. Appeal to the Supreme Court is unknown at this time.

    Reply
  2. Philip Berg: 3 Pending Obama Eligibility Cases In Federal Court « Political Vel Craft says:
    September 27, 2010 at 5:44 PM

    [...] Hollister v. Soetoro, et al [...]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

←
→
Visitor Trackingbest forex broker