Hi to all:
I am watching Hannity on Fox [9:00 p.m. EST] and I do not see revealing story about Obama. This phony article has been traveling the internet for months now.
Also, the “AP” story regarding “Obama’s” Occidental College records; foreign scholarship and other untrue information being sent around in email is PHONY and VERY OLD, as it was first released April 1, 2009.
Join us to raise the Public Awareness to 75 to 100 million and “WE THE PEOPLE” will force Obama from office, as the Court’s continue to delay my cases pending in Federal Court.
I want to raise money to place signs around the country that cause the people in this country who do not know about Obama’s “HOAX” to find out.
The signs by WND [World Net Daily] are a waste of money. Think about it.
Their signs read “Where’s Your Birth Certificate ?” Those signs might cause people to think about Immigration, but not about Obama.
THE SIGNS SHOULD READ, “OBAMA - WHERE IS ”YOUR” BIRTH CERTIFICATE ?” and then people will go home and google Obama & Birth Certificate and then they will be appalled that Obama will not show that he is Constitutionally eligible to be President !
PLEASE – HELP US, HELP YOU to expose Obama the “Fraud;” the “Phony;” the “biggest ‘HOAX’ in over 230 years !”
obamacrimes.com – spread our web site – send money – help us raise money – to expose Obama.
Thank you.
Respectfully,
Philip J. Berg, Esquire
Visa - MasterCard - Discover
Hi Phil
Say. Have you deposed Dr.Chiyome Fukino yet? I bet she is hiding something. The rumor is hat she is not even a real doctor but really a PhD. Keep up the good work. 2012 will be here faster than we think.
Best,
Jimmy
Hi James,
No, not as of today. The cases are in the appellate process and we have not been afforded the opportunity to get to the discovery phase, which is when depositions would occur.
IF THE ALMIGHTY BIRTH-CERTIFICATE SHOWS OR INDICATES THAT B.O. JR IS THE SON OF A NON-IMMIGRANT FOREIGNER THEN HE IS NOT AN ARTICLE II “NATURAL BORN” U.S. CITIZEN REGARDLESS OF WHERE HE WAS BORN. VERY SIMPLE CONCEPT THE INTENT OF THE FRAMERS/FOUNDERS IS CLEAR THERE IS TO EXIST NO FOREIGN ATTACHMENT IN THIS NATIONS STRONG CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE HOLDER
Tom,
Thank you, however that is not our law today, which we are required to follow. The framers intent may have been, and we agree whole heatedly. The problem is, we are forced to work with the law on the books today, the cases that have not been over-turned. And, what today’s law says, it does not matter what citizenship status your parents were/are. If you are born on U.S. soil, you are a natural born U.S. citizen. In other threads I have put a bill currently before Congress to change the Nationality Act and Citizenship status of children born in the U.S. to illegal immigrants. However, this is not the first time this bill has been submitted and it was rejected all the other times.
With all due respect; you are wrong. The Supreme Law of the Land is the United States Constitution –its mandate supersedes all.
Now, I know that you are going to cite all sorts of nonsense( various case law ; state and Fed statute etc. ; born of “mis-construances” based upon the faulty logic of misguided progenitors ) This does NOT fall within the proper scope of the judiciary’s interpretive powers — for they are NOT at liberty to tamper with these core Constitutional provisions certainly not those having such a direct bearing on national security. Nothing short of Amendment can accomplish the Obscurantist’s goal of circumventing the Law through a successful perversion of the Framers ‘original’ intent. The Constitution is a “fixed document”, NOT a “living document”. It has a prescribed , very clearly laid out method for its alteration.
With the exception of a couple of cases, heard at the state level, I am aware of no case that has managed to transform a simple standard U.S. citizen(native born, 14th Amend. cit., derivative cit. etc) into a U.S. Constitution Article II ‘natural born citizen’ Any such assertion is fantasy; a fiction in the law, if you will. What you state regarding the status of one whose only connection to the United States is that they happened to have been born within the nation’s territorial limits; is patently false. Yes, this may be the commonly held misconception but ignorance does not the law make. And no; tacit acceptance of deluded definitions also cannot perform the miracle of altering one’s path to citizenship. No offense, but it would appear, sadly, that you; along with the vast multitudes are desperately in need of a “refresher course” in Natural Law–The TRUE Common Law of the United States.
“It(Our Revolution)….presented us an album on which we were free to write what we pleased. We had no occasion to search into musty records, to hunt up royal parchments, or to investigate the laws and institutions of a semi-barbarous ancestry. We appealed to those(laws) of nature…” Thomas Jefferson to J.Cartwright 1824
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (Cranch 1) 137 (1803): “It cannot be presumed that any clause in the constitution is intended to be without effect; and therefore such construction is inadmissible, unless the words require it.”
“On every question of construction[of the Constitution] let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or intended against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed”
Thomas Jefferson June 12, 1823-letter to Judge William Johnson
“Do not separate text from historical background. If you do you will have perverted and subverted The Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government” James Madison
The Founders/Framers had no intentions, what-so-ever, of permitting NON- U.S. immigrants to install their offspring as Commander in Chief of the United States Armed Forces & Chief Magistrate of the Nation Hence, they crafted Article II Sec 1 CL 5 Must I remind Americans of how OUR Revolution, not to mention a few other subsequent “skirmishes”(think:War of 1812 etc)set out to put an end, once and for all, to this practice .
Tom,
I appreciate what you’re saying. And, no I will not cite a bunch of codes and cases, unless you would like me to. The bottom line is we MUST use the laws on the books today. There are cases others were attempting to use in their quest with the citizenship status of Obama, Sr., however, those cases had been over-turned. An attorney can be sanctioned for using bad law.
What I’m trying to say, is we must formulate our arguments in the Court’s with the law of today. What once was, is no longer. You are incorrect. The Constitution itself has never said “you must be born on US soil to 2 U.S. citizen parents”. Vattell wrote on the subject, but his writings also have been over-turned. See the footnote in the opinion and ruling in the case of Keyes, et al v. Obama, et al, by Judge Carter.
In addition, look at the recent rulings coming down in the other cases, e.g. Allen v. Obama.
As I stated to you, there is a bill that has been submitted attempting to change our laws regarding birth on U.S. soil and citizenship status. And, again, these bills have been submitted several times. Hopefully this one will succeed. The bill states our current law is if born on U.S. soil you are a U.S. “natural born” citizen, regardless of the citizenship status of the parents, or lack thereof.
If you like, I will pull the bill information for you, it is on another thread.
Although, as I stated, I agree with our Forefather’s intent, however, it was never written. Today, regardless of our Forefather’s intent, we are stuck with the current law and that is what we are forced to use. In order to get back to our Forefather’s intents, the laws MUST be changed. In order to change our Laws, you submit bills, like the one currently pending.
Paralegal
If this is the case, that we use today’s Laws, then what is the point of BO’s citizenship status question?
Are you trying to change the Law so you can use the New Law? It would appear that you have no case at Present.
As a citizen, I respect your right to hold and voice your opinions. But PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE buy a copy of Strunk & White or some other writing style book and look up the correct use of the quotation mark. It won’t make you any more right, but it will make you look a little less dumb.
John,
I appreciate your respect of differing opinions, however, am confused. Who is your comment directed to?
Dear Paralegal:
My comment is directed to whoever writes Mr. Berg’s posts; I had assumed it was him. Look at the post I commented on. There is no grammatical reason to have quotation marks around “AP”, “phony”, “hoax”, “fraud” or “Your”. Quotation marks are not meant for emphasis as appears to be the intent here. Regardless of what you think of the Associated Press article, it really was put out by the Associated Press, right? Putting “AP” in quotes makes it look like you/he thinks it was published by some entity masquerading as the AP.
Thanks John. You are right, Mr. Berg did write that particular post – the quotation marks were meant to emphasize the words. that is why he did it that way.
Well, the new ID laws in Florida have assured that Obama will never get a Driver Liscense here.
I really understand what you are trying to do Sir. But if anyone really wanted to get Obama, they only have to call into question the wire tapping that he has me and my daughter under here in Montgomery County where you yourself live also. Sir please check out this web page: http://theanatomyofracism.com
If anyone other then the Media, and the corrupt Politicians knew what is really going on, Obama would be out of office! He has proven himself to be a disgrace to this country. Check out: http://theanatomyofracism.com
Also take a look at the letter that I have written to the Honorable Judge Joseph A Smyth, of the Norristown. I have never been able to have an Attorney represent me in this case. You are a very brave man, and one day I Pray very soon the whole country will know what a sham this administration is, before it is to late. They have destroyed my life and that of my daughter. I am only Praying that we can get them out of there, before any more harm can be done to the American people.
Dorothiea,
I read your letter and didn’t the troubles in Montgomery County begin many years ago? You can’t blame Soetoro/Obama for the incidents regarding the unfortunate issues you have experienced. However, I will stand behind the fact, according to our laws, Soetoro/Obama is still Barry Soetoro an Indonesian Citizen and Constitutionally unqualified to serve as our President of the United States.
You are welcome to call the office, (610) 825-3134 and speak with Mr. Berg regarding the issues you are having and have been having in Montgomery County.
Thank You Paralegal,
You are so right, Barry is not fit to be president. You are also right that my troubles did start years before he took office. But he is president now, and this promblem is now Barry’s I am Praying for Mr. Berg. I will be calling him next week. Thank You for answering. I am just trying to help, and one that is trying to get this man out of office. I feel that he is very dangerous..
Letter to Judge, Norristown court:
http://theanatomyofracism.com/theJudge.pdf
Paralegal,
If you have actually looked at the Constitution of this great country you would have seen the the three rules for anyone who wants to be President to follow to be eligible for the presidency. The main rule states that a person MUST be a Natural born citizen mean be born here in America. Obama/Soetero was born in Mombosa, Kenya so is constitutionally ineligible for the presidency. Which is what John is talking about which we must follow and abide by even now.
Dear Mr. Berg,
I thought you might like to see this video. At about 40 secs Michelle Obama says:
“Barack has led by example. When we took our trip to Africa and visited his home country of Kenya we took a public HIV test…”
As far as I know, the speech is in Las Vegas to an LGBT convention in 2008.
I hope this helps your case. Michelle was speaking very plainly and in or out of context, it seems pretty clear she refers to Kenya as Barack’s birth place (home country).
Thank you for the work you are doing to expose this issue. I hope my modest contribution is of some assistance.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88VB9siP2lY
TD
Lexington, SC
You know i dont get it , i was born in florida when i was around 6 my mother and step father took me to california and had my name legaly changed basicly to hide me from my dad , i never knew this untill i was around 17 i always went by my birth name , at that time my brother was using my name everytime he got pulled over and eventuly got my license suspended for life in florida i tried to go the legal route and was always called a liar cause i had no prof , so i got a license with my adopted name in which was my real and true name , at the time of geting the license police came said i was commiting fraud and had 24 hours to prove who i was or i would be arrested , i gave them my adopted birth cert and they said it wasnt good enough i had to give them the adoption records , i couldnt do that they were sealed in california , so i left florida never to return , i have lived my life under my adopted name and every 4 or 5 years when it is time to renew my license i have to contact the govener , congressman , state rep , so on so forth to fight florida to get the hold off my license to renew , this had went on since i was 17 im now 38 and due for the fight once again next year. a simple thing like this and im questioned , i have a house , loans , cars , kids and marrige under this name , but this guy can just walk in a door and say hey i want to be president and has to prove nothing ?
My son got his fl. license last year and 4 months later lost them. To get a copy he had to produce birth certificate, S.S. I.D. card, school I.D.,2 pieces of mail addresed to him (offical;from govt.or biz-bills, for a 16 year)and an alfidavid signed by me stating ne lived at same address. which I don’t mind if they make Mexicans do the same. But not for the POTUS?
I would like to submit for consideration the following point. Barry’s birth cert. may or may not say he was born in HI. I personally don’t think he was. But, the whole argument may be a clever way to avoid discussing the provable facts. First, the LAW stated until 1986 that in the case of a child born to one US Citizen and one foreign citizen, the US citizen must have lived ten years in the US five of which past the age of fourteen. Barrys mother was 18 so the citizenship reverts to the father.. British as Kenya was under British rule in 1961. Then comes the adoption in Indonesia. Barry had until his 25th birthday to petition the US immigration service for restoration of his US citizenship. But, Indonesia only gave him until 23. By traveling under an Indonesian passport to Pakistan, at age 19, and stopping to renew it in Indonesia, he would have officially declared himself a citizen of Indonesia. Why can’t a paper trail of his trip to Pakistan be found? What about the very clear LAW reverting the citizenship of a child born prior to 1986 under his circumstances to the non-US parent? For that matter, what about the Kenyan birth certificate? As I understand it, the one presented in 2009 appears authentic and is signed by all the right people.
How can all this be deferred and dismissed by those charged with the enforcement of our laws? Will this mean the impeachment of those Senators complicit to this crime? That would include most our house and senate….Scary stuff.
Hi Russel,
I will respond to your comments. You are very accurate, but would like to clarify a few things. The revisions in the Nationality Act are not retroactive, except for the Military Proviso, which did not pertain to Soetoro/Obama. The law used is determined by the date of the birth, in this case, it would be the Nationality Act of 1940, revised in 1952 as Soetoro/Obama was born in 1960. Regarding the Indonesian adoption and/or “legal acknowledgment”, Soetoro/Obama had to relinquish his Indonesian citizenship by the age of twenty-one and then and only then reclaim any U.S. citizenship he may have once held. Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship, this law is all explained on the website under “Indonesian Citizenship Myth”. You are incorrect on the Kenyan Certification of Birth and the Kenyan Birth Certificate filed in California in 2009, those were both found to be forgeries. Lets also not forget, we don’t even know his real name, President Barack H. Obama or is it President Barry Soetoro?
It is hard to say if there will be any impeachment hearings, remember, it is Soetoro/Obama’s Congress. We can only hope and pray.
To clarify my point, he appears to be invalid on several levels for this office. His presidency has been seriously burdened with these questions and if he was legitimate, he could have proven it in one afternoon returning credibility to his office. It also seems that, with so much evidence to the crime, our position should not be so hard to be presented.
Here’s a question…there is much talk of getting this case before the USSC. Yet, it was Chief Justice John Roberts who swore him into office on the Lincoln Bible. Looks like the Court will not take this case. Vattel was a Swiss guy – the Founding Fathers followed English Common Law – born in the Country is Natural Born. Obama is a descendent of Henry “Lighthorse Harry” Lee and his son Robert E. Lee, thus a member of the FFV’s The First Families of Virginia. I am a member also, though my ancestors at Jamestown were two carpenters – not the Gentry. And who really knows who his father is – I think it could be that Chicago guy – Frank Marshall Davis, he was half white – the Pres is very “light” complected – the man from Kenya is VERY dark. My bets are on Davis. Just my ideas – if he was not eligible Hillary’s people would have exposed his ineligibility.
It could be that Hillary’s people realised the political reality that Obama was more popular than either Clinton or John McCain and chose the “lesser evil” of having a Democrat in the White House rather than having Clinton lose to McCain.
I believe that you are right about Frank Marshall Davis being the father however, and I also believe it is possible that Obama was born in Kenya – the visit to Kenya by his mother being necessitated by a desire to validate Barack Obama senior’s claim to be the father. But the trip backfired when the airline would not let his mother on the plane back to Hawaii due to the late stage of her pregnancy, and Barack Obama ended up being born in Africa.
The irony of all the above is that if the truth had been known about Barack Obama’s status as the illegitimate child of an African American civil rights leader, he may never have had the popularity with the voters. America is still a nation of sexual politics. Bill Clinton almost lost his job for being the same kind of womaniser that Frank Marshall Davis was reputed to be. Interestingly, Bill’s tarnished reputation could have rubbed off on Hillary, dashing her chances of becoming President. Instead we got a President who was better at covering his tracks than the indiscreet Clinton. To be fair to Obama however, these indiscretions he is hiding are not of his own making, being those of his parents (or those who he claims are his parents) Rather, his crime is the lack of transparency and dishonesty we expect from a public figure of his standing. This man does not belong in the White House for that reason alone, let alone any of the other reputed sexual and drug scandals that have been rumoured to surround Obama in his adult life. Perhaps this is why Obama and his team would rather focus on legal technicalities surrounding birth certificates and arcane legal arguments about citizenship, rather than investigating the question of whether Barack Obama is morally fit to be President.